The Riemann hypothesis may be true twice.

I am so convinced that the Riemann Hypothesis is true that I like to say that it might be true twice over.[br][br]This activity uses a version of the Riemann zeta function where the values ​​of (n) are negative. The "non-obvious" zeros of this zeta function turn out to have the real part -1/2.[br][br]In this activity, two convergence points are displayed (I would prefer them to be called "Last Origin").[br]The red one corresponds to the trace generated by this activity, the green one is its mirror copy with respect to the imaginary axis.[br][br]The green dot therefore indicates the point of convergence resulting from the Riemann zeta function for (a) of opposite sign and for the same (b).[br][br]On zenodo.org you can find a preprint of mine entitled: "Traces of the Riemann zeta function on the complex plane".[br][br]For those interested:[br][br]This is the link to the latest update of the English version.[br][br]http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8026759[br][br]This is the link to the latest update of the Italian version.[br][br]http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8026728

Information: The Riemann hypothesis may be true twice.