BOB0 - BOTN - EATS DC

BOB0 - BOTN - EATS DC is one of those horrible mnemonic devices that pride-less students love. (Other such monstrosities include cross multiplication, FOIL, SOH-CAH-TOA, and that stupid quadratic formula song.) Let's unpack this mnemonic, I guess. I am not excited about this, but, also being pride-less, I will reluctantly do this if it means you will understand non-vertical asymptotes of rational functions.
"BOB0" means "Bigger On Bottom: 0"
Or, with slightly more detail, if a rational function is "Bigger On Bottom", then it has a horizontal aymptote of [math]y=0[/math]. Or, if you want to say it in a (prideful) way that won't make me cringe:[br][br]Let [math]r[/math] be a rational function that we write as [math]r\left(x\right)=\frac{p\left(x\right)}{q\left(x\right)}[/math], where [math]p[/math] and [math]q[/math] are polynomials, and let the degree of [math]q[/math] be greater than the degree of [math]p[/math]. Then [math]r[/math] has a horizontal asymptote of [math]y=0[/math].[br][br]
Plot a "BOB0" rational function.
Let [math]f(x)[/math] be a BOB0 rational function, so therefore we can write a limit to describe its end behavior. We can write [math]\lim_{x\to A}f\left(x\right)=B[/math], where...
Which of the following could be [math]A[/math]?
Which of the following could be [math]B[/math]?
Explain in your own words why BOB0 works. (Meaning, why is it the case that Bigger On Bottom results in a horizontal asymptote of [math]y=0[/math]?)
"BOTN" means...
Well, what do you think BOTN is meant to convey? Try to explain it in a way that won't make me cringe. If you need to experiment before you answer, skip ahead to the next question.
Plot a "BOTN" rational function.
Let [math]f(x)[/math] be a BOTN rational function, so therefore we can write a limit to describe its end behavior. We can write [math]\lim_{x\to A}f\left(x\right)=B[/math], where...
Which of the following could be [math]A[/math]?
Which of the following could be [math]B[/math]?
Explain in your own words why BOTN works.
"EATS DC" means "Exponents Are The Same: Divide Coefficients"
Okay, so the way I would articulate EATS DC this way:[br][br]Let [math]r\left(x\right)=\frac{p\left(x\right)}{q\left(x\right)}[/math] be a rational function where [math]p[/math] is a polynomial with leading coefficient [math]a[/math], and [math]q[/math] is a polynomial with leading coefficient [math]b[/math]. Let the degree of [math]p[/math] be equal the degree of [math]q[/math]. Then [math]r[/math] has a horizontal asymptote of [math]y=\frac{a}{b}[/math].
Plot an "EATS DC" rational function.
Let [math]r\left(x\right)=\frac{p\left(x\right)}{q\left(x\right)}[/math] be an EATS DC rational function where [math]p[/math] is a polynomial with leading coefficient [math]a[/math], and [math]q[/math] is a polynomial with leading coefficient [math]b[/math]. We can therefore write [math]\lim_{x\to A}r\left(x\right)=B[/math] to describe [math]r[/math]'s end behavior, where...
Which of the following could be [math]A[/math]?
Which of the following could be [math]B[/math]?
Close

Information: BOB0 - BOTN - EATS DC