Images. Placing points on a sphere such that the each point is the geometric median of all its other points.

[size=85]By optimal placement we mean the placement of points on the sphere in such a way that each point is the geometric median of all its other points. The algorithm allows you to find [b]only[/b] the placement with the values of [b]highest Distance Sum[/b]. To find other symmetric arrangements of particles on a sphere it is possible (for example) as in [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/hw9hhq3h]https://www.geogebra.org/m/hw9hhq3h[/url]. As it turns out, [br]-for optimal placements, it is characteristic that the each point is not only a geometric median but also the geometric center of all its other points,[br]-for a given number of n points, the number of different such optimal placements on the sphere can be 0, 1, 2 , ... . [br] An example is the case of n=8: 1, 2, 3. The second solution corresponds to the case of uniform distribution of points on the sphere. For the cases n=12 and n=14 are found two optimal placements.[br] Examples n=60, 120 are close to a uniform distribution of points on the sphere and are not optimal![/size]
n=8. Three different optimal arrangements of points on the sphere.
[size=85]n=8 [br]1. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_antiprism]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_antiprism[/url], [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/gxupq4rg]https://www.geogebra.org/m/gxupq4rg[/url][br]2. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cube]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cube[/url], [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/kkekxqbc]https://www.geogebra.org/m/kkekxqbc[/url][br]3. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrobifastigium]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrobifastigium[/url][/size]
n=12. Two different optimal arrangements of points on the sphere.
[size=85]n=12[br]1. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icosahedron]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icosahedron[/url], [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/c6x7fagc]https://www.geogebra.org/m/c6x7fagc[/url][br]2. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuboctahedron]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuboctahedron[/url], [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/hqxgevjp]https://www.geogebra.org/m/hqxgevjp[/url][/size]
n=14. Two different optimal arrangements of points on the sphere.
[size=85]n=14[br]1. [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/artwn5yf]https://www.geogebra.org/m/artwn5yf[/url][br]2. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrakis_hexahedron]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrakis_hexahedron[/url], [url=https://www.geogebra.org/m/ceawhc23]https://www.geogebra.org/m/ceawhc23[/url][/size]
Examples n=60, 120 close to a uniform distribution of points on the sphere are not optimal. Each point is not a geometric median and at the same time is the geometric center of all its other points.

Information: Images. Placing points on a sphere such that the each point is the geometric median of all its other points.