We learned that if one figure is [b]congruent[/b] to another it can be transformed to the other using [b]a sequence of rigid transformations[/b]. In other words, if two figures are congruent we can map one onto the other using only [b]translations[/b], [b]reflections[/b] and [b]rotations[/b]. Let's use this to answer the questions below:
Which [b]rigid transformation [/b]takes △[math]DEF[/math] to △[math]MNO[/math]? (Please select 2 choices)
Which rigid transformation shows that △[math]PQR[/math] is congruent to △[math]E_1D_1F_1[/math]? (Please select 2 choices)
Which shape is not congruent to any of the others?
Which sequence of transformations does [u][b]not[/b][/u] show that △[math]JKL[/math] is congruent to △[math]STU[/math]? (The triangles have been provided again below for convenience)
[left][/left]Consider the triangles below. They have been constructed in such a way that guarantees that they will remain [b]congruent[/b](the same). Move the vertices to see that they remain congruent. Use a sequence of transformations to show that they are congruent.
What sequence of transformations did you use?
What sequence of transformations could you use to show that △[math]ABC[/math] and △[math]DEF[/math] are congruent? Feel free to check your answer by performing your suggested sequence but it is not required.